Respondent argues that Dr. Deisher «has not established forth a cogent idea of vaccine causation that would make feeling to unbiased, proficient experts.» Resp. Prehrg Br. dated February 8, 2016 (ECF No. 222) at 2. Respondent additional argues that Dr. Deisher’s «methodology is unscientific,» and that her expert experiences incorporate «scientifically inaccurate or dubious propositions.»…
Read More