Respondent argues that Dr. Deisher «has not established forth a cogent idea of vaccine causation that helps make feeling to unbiased, experienced scientists.» Resp. Prehrg Br. dated February 8, 2016 (ECF No. 222) at two. Respondent even further argues that Dr. Deisher’s «methodology is unscientific,» and that her qualified reports incorporate «scientifically inaccurate or dubious…
Read More